United States
- U.S. enterprise clients may request a security questionnaire, vendor risk review, and evidence under NDA.
Trust Center
Security built into delivery
Secure Software Development Lifecycle
How security requirements, secure design, code review, testing, dependency scanning, secret scanning, CI/CD controls, release approval, and monitoring fit into delivery.
How this page supports country onboarding
Country pages link here for a safe public summary before detailed questionnaires are shared under NDA.
Important note
This page is general onboarding and review information. It is not legal, tax, regulatory, cybersecurity, financial, or compliance advice, and it does not create certification claims or service commitments. Final obligations belong in signed agreements and approved project documents.
Approach
Security is a delivery discipline
Secure SDLC means security is considered during requirements, design, implementation, review, testing, deployment, and post-release support. The exact controls depend on project scope, architecture, data sensitivity, budget, timeline, and client environment.
Controls
Common practices
Practices may include security requirements, threat modeling where appropriate, secure design review, secure coding standards, peer review, automated tests, static analysis where appropriate, dependency scanning, secret scanning, infrastructure-as-code review, CI/CD controls, environment separation, release approval, vulnerability remediation, and monitoring.
Evidence
Evidence depth depends on access level
Public pages describe the process. Detailed implementation evidence, control mappings, screenshots, scan output, or internal procedures may require NDA and client-specific review.
Preparation
Buyer checklist
Define security requirements during discovery.
Identify authentication, authorization, payment, data, and admin risks.
Use peer review and automated checks before release.
Review dependencies and secrets.
Track vulnerabilities and remediation decisions.
Review materials
Available artifacts
- Secure SDLC summary
- Security checklist
- PR checklist
- Release checklist
- Risk review notes
Local overlays
Country-specific notes
United Kingdom
- United Kingdom security review should use the project risk level, data categories, hosting model, access needs, and regulated-industry flags captured in technical discovery.
- Review flags for United Kingdom: Legal review, Privacy review, Security review, UK transfer review when applicable.
- Hosting and access options to discuss: Client-owned UK cloud, UK or EU hosting by agreement, Limited production access model.
European Union / EEA
- EU/EEA projects involving personal data should align Secure SDLC with DPA, hosting, transfer, and subprocessor review.
South Korea
- South Korea security review should use the project risk level, data categories, hosting model, access needs, and regulated-industry flags captured in technical discovery.
- Review flags for South Korea: PIPA review, Cross-border transfer review, Security review, Procurement review, Regulated-industry review when applicable.
- Hosting and access options to discuss: Client-owned South Korea cloud, South Korea region hosting by agreement, Limited production access model, No-production-data-access model.
Canada
- Canada security review should use the project risk level, data categories, hosting model, access needs, and regulated-industry flags captured in technical discovery.
- Review flags for Canada: Privacy review, Security review, Procurement review.
- Hosting and access options to discuss: Client-owned Canadian cloud, Canadian hosting by agreement, Limited production access model.
Australia
- Australia security review should use the project risk level, data categories, hosting model, access needs, and regulated-industry flags captured in technical discovery.
- Review flags for Australia: Privacy review, Security review, Procurement review.
- Hosting and access options to discuss: Client-owned Australian cloud, Australian hosting by agreement, Limited production access model.
Singapore
- Singapore security review should use the project risk level, data categories, hosting model, access needs, and regulated-industry flags captured in technical discovery.
- Review flags for Singapore: Privacy review, Security review, Procurement review.
- Hosting and access options to discuss: Client-owned Singapore cloud, Singapore hosting by agreement, Limited production access model.
United Arab Emirates
- United Arab Emirates security review should use the project risk level, data categories, hosting model, access needs, and regulated-industry flags captured in technical discovery.
- Review flags for United Arab Emirates: Privacy review, Security review, Procurement review, Regulated-industry review when applicable.
- Hosting and access options to discuss: Client-owned UAE cloud, UAE hosting by agreement, Limited production access model.
External references
Framework references
Next review
Related trust pages
Code Review
How pull requests, reviewer assignment, protected branches, sensitive-change review, dependency review, AI-generated code review, and emergency changes are handled.
OWASP
How OWASP Top 10 awareness, ASVS-inspired verification, input validation, output encoding, authentication, authorization, cryptography, logging, file uploads, SSRF, and API security influence delivery.
Vulnerability Management
How vulnerabilities are reported, triaged, classified, tracked, remediated, excepted, and communicated where appropriate.
Cloud Security
How cloud ownership, IAM, MFA, regions, network controls, secrets, encryption, logging, environment separation, patching, monitoring, and handover are handled.
Connect this review to country onboarding
Use this page with the country onboarding guide so your legal, procurement, security, privacy, finance, and engineering teams have the right review path before contract signature.